Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘english’ Category

Chickens Range Free

Attempting to draw her readers in with anastrophic wordplay, Jo Smith’s opinion piece, ‘Chickens Range Free’ was written in response to the illegal release of a truckload of poultry on its way to the abattoir. It was published both on a website and in a Melbournian newspaper. As the politically loaded language of the gloss [...]

Read Full Post »

The Analytical: expository and/or critical
Typically divided in three main sections (Introduction, Body, and Conclusion), analytical essays strive to achieve rational, unbiased and systematic treatments of their subject. In order to meet such aims, the personal presence of the author is usually left absent from the presentation – although in recent years, an establishment of ethos [...]

Read Full Post »

Language Analysis: Response to ‘Killer Cars’
Melanie Masters’ article, ‘Killer Cars – an Assault on Reason’, capitalises on recent findings which indicate that the behaviour of people who drive four-wheel drive vehicles (4WDs) as well as other automobiles, changes according to which car they are in. Bringing a number of related issues to play on these [...]

Read Full Post »

Part A – Analysis of Language Use
Introduction
While the overt intention of The Australian Government’s ‘Keep Australia Safe’ advertisement is both to inform people of the National Security Hotline and to encourage those who have any potentially helpful information to report it, it is also fair to assume that it serves the implicit purpose of suggesting [...]

Read Full Post »

One may quite reasonably suppose that to read homosexual undertones into any and all works composed by authors of said sexuality would be to display a degree of prejudice quite unfounded by either reason or empirical evidence. No matter whether the discrimination be favourable or derogatory, such gross generalisations would be akin, say, to presuming [...]

Read Full Post »

With regard to the Truth, two starkly contrasting philosophical positions spring to mind: on the one hand you have the idealists, and, on the other, the pragmatists.
The champion of idealism, Immanuel Kant, claimed that one should do nothing that reason determines would detrimental if everyone were to do it also. So, of lying: Kant argued [...]

Read Full Post »